Categories
Uncategorized

First Digital Democracy Conference Bangkok

Center for Ethics of Science and Technology, Chulalongkorn University,
Siam Intelligence Unit (support by Thai Health Promotion),
Thai Netizen Network and Noviscape Consulting Group

20 November 2012, 9:00 – 16:00
Room 310 and Room 815, Maha Chakri Building,

Faculty of Arts, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok

The Internet has revolutionized the way of communication and has become a global connection network for everyone. The new level of connectivity and computer-mediated social interaction has slowly changed not only digital awareness of citizens, in terms of access to communication and privacy, but has also increased political awareness and public participation in political issues. Furthermore, the Internet has become a channel for the voices of citizens enabling all kinds of new political forces. And soon the Internet itself could be a major political cause.
This conference aims to explore a wide field of digital democracy from different points of view. We would like to initiate a new multidisciplinary research field to explore the arising issues related to digital democracy, especially in Southeast Asia. Furthermore, we would like to reach policy makers and IT-professionals, in order to cross communicate between both groups, especially in the issues concerning the use of information and communication technologies and strategies in political and governance processes.
This one day conference consists of public and invited sessions. The morning session is open for the public with six 20-minutes talks on different topics concerning digital democracy. The afternoon session will be a discussion round in a closed group with invited guests. We would like to brainstorm new ideas for further field building in digital democracy and research tracks. Engaging trans-disciplinary ideas to formulate a cluster of knowledge excellence in digital technology and democratization.

Objectives:

1.    To build-up digital democracy as a new research and knowledge field in both higher educational institutes and other research-oriented organizations.
2.    To establish a group of researchers and practitioners from various disciplines in order to generate and disseminate knowledge and issues regarding to cyberspace participation, digital politics, rights and ethics, technological and social changes, and other forthcoming agendas relating to digital democracy in Thailand and other Asian countries.
3.    To create a high quality and dynamic space for ideas, openness, dignity, embracement, and inclusion for cyber-citizens and other bodies.

We would like to examine digital democracy from a number of perspectives throughout the conference. The topics are as following.

1. Socialization of digital technologies
Accessibility is the most important requirement of digital democracy (e.g. Internet accessibility in Thailand is still around 20-25%). The digital divide is not only an issue of physical accessibility e.g. lack of digital facilities, but also an issue for disabled people and senior citizens. The use of social and digital media for each institution needs to be inclusive, otherwise the prevailing digital divide – between the haves and have-nots – will prevent certain groups of citizens to actively take part in this so-called participatory governance. This raises the issue of fairness – fair and equal involvement of all citizens, otherwise it will lead to the segregation of the citizens and create second-class citizens – those who are disconnected.

2. Technological innovation and political space
Open government is a governance approach, which encompasses the principles of “information transparency, public engagement, and accountability”. Open government, however, requires a holistic approach on policies, the legal and regulatory framework, institutional structure, and process. An overall strategy or direction, at both the national and agency-level, on the use of social media should be in place. Without this, it might lead to confusion for both officers and citizens. For example, what kind of information should be released or communicated on official channels and what should be done via social media and who should be in charge.

3. Digital space & communication style
New media and hate speech: Political discussions seem to be more heated online. How can we respond to hate speech or even identify any content as such? How can we establish a constructive discussion culture?
Digital censorship and self censorship: The extent of Internet Censorship varies on a country-to-country basis. Moreover, some countries have little Internet Censorship, while other countries go as far as to limit the access of information to such matters as the news and suppress discussion among the internet population. Internet Censorship also occurs in response to or in keenness of events such as elections, protests, and riots. Governments across Southeast Asia share different degrees of authoritarian style digital censorship. Governmental monitoring of internet usage and blocking of international sites can be seen in Burma, Cambodia, the Philippines, Thailand, and Vietnam (Doherty, 2010). It is likely that censorship will be increased due to the events of the Arab Spring, Thailand’s Political Turmoil, and Myanmar political unrests.

4. Institutionalization of digital politics
ON-OFF line: The line between online and offline participation in politics is disappearing. How can we channel online enthusiasm into real-world action? What can we learn from online petitions or online recruitments for political purpose in Thailand? What can we learn from Malaysia with its strongest digital politics movement in Southeast Asia?
Political Party & Cyberspace: What could we do for more digital democracy? Does it have to be a political party? Is it enough to establish a movement? (e.g. BIG Trees project and Bangkok Bicycle Campaign). What does an initiative need to become a movement? (e.g. mainstreaming, sharing bite-size information that people can feel connected).

5. Digital security:
Security is a timely issue among governmental agencies. Apart from traditional security that has been associated with national defense and international diplomacy, a non-traditional security issue emerges from “grand challenges” like natural disasters, change of technological regime, emerging diseases or climate change, and other new threats, become a new normal of daily life. Digital technology accelerates social change and the way national security being conform. New key players have more involvement with both security domains. In this aspect, digital security is a bridge between traditional and non-traditional security and will ultimately blur the existing paradigm on categorization of social and security institutions.

6. Strategy and internationalization of digital politics
Digital Democracy in SEA context: Considering the ASEAN members, e-Participation in the region, with the exception of Singapore, does not seem to be progressing satisfactorily. In 2012, for example, Malaysia and Brunei are in the top twenty rankings, while Thailand, Indonesia, the Philippines, and Vietnam have managed to be ranked within the top thirty, whereas data prohibits meaningful rankings for Myanmar, Cambodia and Laos. The utilization of digital and social media by government agencies in those countries to reach out to their citizens is not a common practice. ASEAN governments in general, and Thailand in particular, have not yet been able to capitalize on the popularity and tremendous growth of social media despite the obvious growth of social media use among their citizens. How is the use of digital media in political issues in other countries in Southeast asia? What can we learn from their situation?

Program (Tentative)

Public session: Room 310, Maha Chakri Building

9:00 – 9:30
Registration

9:30 – 9:45
Introduction and opening remarks, Dr. Jittiporn Chaisaingmongkol
Speaker session hosted by Dr. Pun-Arj Chairatana

9:50 – 10:10
Socialization of digital technologies: Digital divide, Dr.Kasititorn Pooparadai, NECTEC

10:10 – 10:30
Net Neutrality, Dr. Soraj Hongladarom, Chulalongkorn University

10:30 – 10:50
Digital security, Dr. Teeranan Nandhakwang

10:50 – 11:10
Digital space & communication style: New media and hate speech, Dr. Pirongrong Ramasoota Rananand, Chulalongkorn University

11:10 – 11:30
Countering Hate Speech: Wikipedia as a Socio-technical Solution?, Dr. Chanchai Chaisukkosol

11:30 – 11:50
Institutionalization of digital politics: ON-OFF line, Sombat Boonngamanong

11:50 – 12:00
Closing remarks for public session

12:00 -13:00
Lunch

Invited session:  Room 815, Maha Chakri Building

13:00 – 14:30
Roundtable discussion I hosted by Pichate Yingkiattikun

14:30 – 14:45
Coffee break

14:45 – 15:45
Roundtable discussion II

15:45 – 16:00
Closing and concluding remark by Dr. Soraj Hongladarom

Categories
conference

First Digital Democracy Conference Bangkok

This conference aims to explore a wide field of digital democracy from different points of view. We would like to initiate a new multidisciplinary research field to explore the arising issues related to digital democracy, especially in Southeast Asia.

Furthermore, we would like to reach policy makers and IT-professionals, in order to cross communicate between both groups, especially in the issues concerning the use of information and communication technologies and strategies in political and governance processes.

This one day conference consists of public and invited sessions. The morning session is open for the public with six 20-minutes talks on different topics concerning digital democracy. The afternoon session will be a discussion round in a closed group with invited guests. We would like to brainstorm new ideas for further field building in digital democracy and research tracks. Engaging trans-disciplinary ideas to formulate a cluster of knowledge excellence in digital technology and democratization.

The conference will be in Thai

Program (Tentative)
Date: November 20, 2012
Public session: Room 310, Maha Chakri Building

9:00 – 9:30 Registration
9:30 – 9:45 Introduction and opening remarks
Dr. Jittiporn Chaisaingmongkol
Speaker session hosted by Dr. Pun-Arj Chairatana
9:50 – 10:10 Socialization of digital technologies: Digital divide
Dr.Kasititorn Pooparadai, NECTEC
10:10 – 10:30 Net Neutrality
Dr. Soraj Hongladarom, Chulalongkorn University
10:30 – 10:50 Digital security
Dr. Teeranan Nandhakwang
10:50 – 11:10 New media and hate speech
(Speaker to be announced)
11:10 – 11:30 Countering Hate Speech: Wikipedia as a
Socio-technical Solution?
Dr. Chanchai Chaisukkosol
11:30 – 11:50 Institutionalization of digital politics: ON-OFF line
Sombat Boonngamanong
11:50 – 12:00 Closing remarks for public session

12:00 -13:00 Lunch

Invited session: Room 815, Maha Chakri Building
13:00 – 14:30 Roundtable discussion I hosted by
Pichate Yingkiattikun
14:30 – 14:45 Coffee break
14:45 – 15:45 Roundtable discussion II hosted by
Pichate Yingkiattikun
15:45 – 16:00 Closing and concluding remark by
Dr. Soraj Hongladarom

Organized by Center for Ethics of Science and Technology, Chulalongkorn University, Siam Intelligence Unit (support by Thai Health Promotion), Thai Netizen Network and Noviscape Consulting Group

Categories
Craig Smith

Vesak

Vesak:

Buddha’s Unfinished Business in Thailand

By Craig Warren Smith

On May 9 the moon over Bangkok will be bright and the streets empty.   Why?  Because in 1950 the World Fellowship of Buddhists arbitrarily decided that the moon’s fullest day in May would each year mark Buddha Day, what Thais call Visak.

So what does Visak mean for Thais this year?  It is tempting to answer: time to go shopping.

Hmmm.  Filling up one’s shopping cart at Siam Paragon may not be a good way to celebrate the legacy of the Sakya prince who for over 2500 years has inspired the civilized world to look beyond material pleasures to find the deeper meaning of their lives.

Instead, Beyond that Thais – particularly the country’s leaders — should consider three compelling factors that make Buddha Day relevant to Thailand today.

  1. EDUCATION Shedding its status as a religion, Buddhism is being reborn as a secular learning process called “mindfulness.” Mindfulness is an essential skill for every Thai, not just monks.  It could bring new life to Thailand’s antiquated educational system.

At a time when Asians get their values from the West, that are surprised to learn that Westerners increasingly get their values from Asia. America is Buddhism’s new Mecca.  It started about 40 years ago,  when Buddhist adepts from Southeast Asia, Korea, China and Tibet found San Francisco as their new watering hole. As these separate Asian cultural influences canceled out each other, Buddhism spread through US universities and emerged as a secular philosophy called “mindfulness,” a sophisticated way of training the mind which has replaced the West’s idiotic fixation on Freudian psychology as a way to cope with stress.   At least 1,000 peer-reviewed journals explain how health care systems can achieve their aims more quickly, less expensively and more ethically if they incorporate mindfulness into their therapies.

But stress-reduction is not all that mindfulness can do. Some of America’s most prestigious neuroscience labs have produced functional magnetic resonance images that prove how mindfulness can make the brain more pliable (they call it by the fancy word “neuroplasticity,”) and therefore a basis for interactive learning. “Learning how to learn” is a 21st century art, says the Dalai Lama. One of his students,  the best selling author Dan Goleman explained that mindfulness is the key to “emotional intelligence,” suggesting the more than cognitive skills are involved in learning.  Like Goldman, MIT Professor (and AmericanBuddhist) Peter Senge has sold millions of books proposing that educational systems be remade into mindfulness-inspired “learning organizations.”   He says mindfulness presents a shield against addictions.  Thais could use mindfulness to tackle alcohol, sex and smoking addictions.

  1. THE ECONOMY A Buddhist philosophy called “sufficiency economy” is not just an ethical plaything of the monarchy.  It could be the key to a distinctly Thai approval to economic stimulus:  mindfulness help revive GDP while at the same time halting mindless consumerism and lessen global warming.

It may be a good thing that that ASEAN Summit in Pattaya didn’t happen.  Thailand did not offer its own home-grown model of economic stimulus to offer to their ASEAN partners.   “Buddhist economics,”  a term introduced by EF Schumacher in 1973 refers to the notion that, after meeting basic needs,  economies need not be geared to endless consumerism but to the cultivation of fundamental human values.  His Majesty the King embraced this notion, renaming it Sufficiency Economy.  Thanks to the Crown Property Bureau, Sufficiency Economy is becoming part of the national education curriculum, but it could go further to become the basis of economic transformation.   The Thai National Economic and Social Development Board (NESDB) should take notice.

  1. DEMOCRACY:   Mindfulness is a key to strengthening citizen participation in Thailand and, by so doing,  solving the tug-of-war between red and yellow shirts.   Democracy could grow from the bottom-up.

Democracy isn’t just about “one man, one vote,”  a notion that can be corrupted through vote buying and debased through crass populism.  Democracy works when citizens participate, rather than wait for government to fix things. As noted by the Dalai Lama,  Buddhism is ultimately democratic in that it focuses on helping each citizen make his own free choice about how to find happiness.

Thai democracy has been high-jacked as a political slogans by red shirts and yellow shirts.  oriented and Yellow-shirted coalitions.  The Thai government should take a cue from Paiboon xx, the former deputy prime minister,  by

Again, the question of how to bring interactive learning to the village level through mindfulness practices should be a serious topic for the NESDB,  who could formulate an economy based on technology-assisted interactive learning in which mindfulness becomes a driving force.

WHERE TO START?

The Prime Minister should ask the Education Ministry’s Commission on Basic Education to bring mindfulness into the school curriculum.  He should ask the Science & Technology Ministry’s NECTEC into a design center for software based on  mindfulness principles. He should ask the National Telecommunications Commission for regulations  that cause Thailand’s mobile operators to bring mindfulness learning applications to cell phone users in Thailand.

To fulfill the meaning of Visak,  leaders of Thailand must offer an alternative to the vapid “lifestyle” concepts promoted to consumers.   The life choices of the Buddha lead not  to consumerism but to happiness.   Thus, Visak offer the course-correction that Thai society needs.  To be stewards of the Buddha’s own vision,  they must bring this lifestyle into the 21st century using all the tools at our command.

Craig Warren Smith, is the Director of the Meaningful Broadband Working Group at Chulalongkorn University. This month he is the resident meditation teacher in Amanjiwo,  a resort located near the ancient Buddhist temple Borobodur, Indonesia. www.amanjiwo.com.

Categories
conference

Social and Ethical Dimensions of Information Technology

การประชุมวิชาการ “มิติทางสังคมและจริยธรรมของเทคโนโลยีสารสนเทศ”
ห้อง 105 อาคารมหาจุฬาลงกรณ์ จุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย

15 กรกฎาคม พ.ศ. 2552

******************************************************************

กำหนดการ

8:45 – 9:00 พิธีเปิด

9:00 – 9:45 “Buddhism and Information Technology”
ศ. ดร. สมภาร พรมทา

9:45 – 10:15 พัก

10:15 – 11:00 “Blogging and Thai Society: Unleashing Potentials and Perils in a Troubling Democracy”
ผศ. ดร. พิรงรอง รณะนันทน์

11:00 – 11:45 “Impacts of the Social Network in Thai Society” ผศ. ดร. ภัทรสินี ภัทรโกศล

11:45 – 12:30 “The Philosophy of Creative Commons and Open Source Movement” รศ. ดร. โสรัจจ์ หงศ์ลดารมภ์

12:30 – 13:30 อาหารกลางวัน

13:30 – 14:15 “Information Technology and the Threat towards a Surveillance Society in European Countries: Some Lessons for Thailand?”
ผศ. ดร. กฤษณา กิติยาดิศัย

14:15 – 15:00 หัวข้อจะประกาศภายหลัง
ผศ. ดร. ดวงกมล ชาติประเสริฐ

15:00 – 15:30 “How Data Can Survive Over the Internet World”
นายวศิน สุทธฉายา

15:30 – 16:00 พัก

16:00 – 16:30 หัวข้อจะประกาศภายหลัง
นางสาวพิมลพรรณ ไชยนันท์

16:30 – 17:15 อภิปรายทั่วไป